Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Date: 2017-05-31 14:20:00
Message-ID: cf6a7c956f9346667bbbdaab64b1b562@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-05-31 11:16, Petr Jelinek wrote:
[...]
> Thanks to Mark's offer I was able to study the issue as it happened and
> found the cause of this.
>
> [0001-Improve-handover-logic-between-sync-and-apply-worker.patch]

This looks good:

-- out_20170531_1141.txt
100 -- pgbench -c 90 -j 8 -T 60 -P 12 -n -- scale 25
100 -- All is well.

So this is 100x a 1-minute test with 100x success. (This on the most
fastidious machine (slow disks, meagre specs) that used to give 15%
failures)

I'll let it run for a couple of days with varying params (and on varying
hardware) but it definitely does look as if you fixed it.

Thanks!

Erik Rijkers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-05-31 14:49:05 Re: TAP backpatching policy
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2017-05-31 14:14:17 Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)