Re: logical replication worker and statistics

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical replication worker and statistics
Date: 2017-04-10 16:52:21
Message-ID: cf0bb3d8-074c-2bd2-1e61-b1d52f81f28e@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/9/17 22:20, Noah Misch wrote:
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> toward speedy resolution. Thanks.

Discussion is ongoing, patch is proposed, should be resolved this week.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-04-10 16:53:38 Re: pg_upgrade vs extension upgrades
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-10 16:50:54 Re: logical replication worker and statistics