From: | "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "vignesh C" <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Masahiko Sawada" <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Separate GUC for replication origins |
Date: | 2025-03-14 00:54:40 |
Message-ID: | ceebf8f4-709f-49b1-9b27-f2b1b4646d4e@app.fastmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 11:10 AM, vignesh C wrote:
> Few comments:
Thanks for taking a look.
> 1) After selecting max_active_replication_origins setting in the
> SELECT query having order by, the first record returned will be the
> one with max_active_replication_origins, rather than the second
> record, because max_active_replication_origins appears before
> max_logical_replication_workers in the order.
Fixed.
> 2) I felt max_replication_slots must be max_active_replication_origins
> here in logical-replication.sgml:
Fixed.
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v6-0001-Separate-GUC-for-replication-origins.patch | text/x-patch | 26.9 KB |
v6-0002-max_active_replication_origins-defaults-to-10.patch.nocfbot | application/octet-stream | 4.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-03-14 01:15:34 | Re: Query ID Calculation Fix for DISTINCT / ORDER BY and LIMIT / OFFSET |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-03-14 00:27:52 | Re: Query ID Calculation Fix for DISTINCT / ORDER BY and LIMIT / OFFSET |