Re: A little confusion about JSON Path

From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A little confusion about JSON Path
Date: 2019-10-18 07:04:54
Message-ID: ce47cf6f-6c1e-8172-88b5-31991fbf7dbc@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Laurenz Albe schrieb am 17.10.2019 um 13:25:
>> I don't understand why the following two JSON Path expressions aren't doing the same thing in Postgres 12:
>>
>> jsonb_path_exists(data, '$.k1.list.type() ? (@ == "array")'), -- returns true as expected
>> jsonb_path_exists(data, '$.k1.list ? (@.type() == "array")') -- returns false - not expected
>>
>> Apparently "@.type()" returns something different then "$.k1.list.type()"
>>
> This seems to be a consequence of "lax" mode:
>
> "Besides, comparison operators automatically unwrap their operands in the lax mode,
> so you can compare SQL/JSON arrays out-of-the-box. An array of size 1 is considered
> equal to its sole element. Automatic unwrapping is not performed only when:
>
> - The path expression contains type() or size() methods that return the type and
> the number of elements in the array, respectively.
>
> (from https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/functions-json.html)
>
> with sample (data) as (
> values
> ('{"k1": {"list":[1,2,3]}}'::jsonb)
> )
> select data,
> jsonb_path_exists(data, '$.k1.list ? (@.type() == "number")'), -- lax mode unwraps the array
> jsonb_path_exists(data, 'strict $.k1.list ? (@.type() == "array")') -- strict mode doesn't
> from sample;

Ah, thanks. I did not see that part.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Kretschmer 2019-10-18 07:08:17 Re: Postgres Point in time Recovery (PITR),
Previous Message Олег Самойлов 2019-10-18 06:55:14 Re: stable for each row before insert trigger