Re: DELETE eats up all memory and crashes box

From: "Worky Workerson" <worky(dot)workerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DELETE eats up all memory and crashes box
Date: 2006-10-06 19:00:20
Message-ID: ce4072df0610061200k54835a59x93e8e0caadba3d83@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/6/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Worky Workerson" <worky(dot)workerson(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > When I issue a fairly large DELETE query which has multiple tables
> > with FOREIGN KEY .... CASCADE on them, Postgres eats up *all* the
> > memory on my system and the system crashes.
>
> Well, the memory eating is easy to explain: pending-trigger-event list.
> System crash sounds like a kernel bug or misconfiguration. You might
> want to make sure you have "strict" memory overcommit mode set, else the
> problem might just be an inopportune choice of target by the OOM killer.

You were right ... had my vm.overcommit_memory set to 0 (default).
Now the process gets killed soon after it starts.

Is there any way to tune PG to execute such a query, or am I forced to
forgo the convenience of the "ON DELETE CASCADE" and manually delete
the records with a subselect?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-06 19:05:48 Re: DELETE eats up all memory and crashes box
Previous Message Casey Duncan 2006-10-06 18:36:51 Re: Two efficiency questions - clustering and ints