Re: Questions about Views, Rules and DBLink

From: Joao Afonso <joaoaafonso(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Questions about Views, Rules and DBLink
Date: 2005-08-01 10:24:44
Message-ID: ce04e69f0508010324196b2ef6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks for your help. But still, do you think there could be a way to
alter the dblink_current_query() function so that it could return the
right query? Or should I try to build the query in a function and send
it through dblink instead of dblink_current_query()?

I've also been told that oracle has an auditing service that records
every action the users make, including the queries issued. If pg has
something like that I could use it instead.

On 8/1/05, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Joao Afonso <joaoaafonso(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > So (finally), my question is why does this happen? Using instead on
> > the users_util insert rule shouldn't discard the original query and
> > rewrite it according to the specified on the rule?? Is this a problem
> > of dblink?
>
> I hadn't noticed the dblink_current_query() function before, but now
> that I see it, I consider it a pretty bad idea. It certainly will not
> help you the way you are hoping, because what it returns is the text of
> the interactive command the backend is currently working on --- which
> could be indefinitely far removed from the operation your rule is firing
> for.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Bernier 2005-08-01 11:28:41 Re: New MySQL to PostgreSQL Migration Guide
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-08-01 05:59:55 Re: New MySQL to PostgreSQL Migration Guide