From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sequence's value can be rollback after a crashed recovery. |
Date: | 2021-11-22 07:22:24 |
Message-ID: | cdf423e0339fc84794158b7b0f650214b3620e04.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 14:57 +0800, Andy Fan wrote:
> Should we guarantee the sequence's nextval should never be rolled back
> even in a crashed recovery case?
> I can produce the rollback in the following case:
>
> Session 1:
> CREATE SEQUENCE s;
> BEGIN;
> SELECT nextval('s'); \watch 0.01
>
> Session 2:
> kill -9 {sess1.pid}
>
> After the restart, the nextval('s') may be rolled back (less than the
> last value from session 1).
>
> The reason is because we never flush the xlog for the nextval_internal
> for the above case. So if
> the system crashes, there is nothing to redo from. It can be fixed
> with the following online change
> code.
>
> @@ -810,6 +810,8 @@ nextval_internal(Oid relid, bool check_permissions)
> recptr = XLogInsert(RM_SEQ_ID, XLOG_SEQ_LOG);
>
> PageSetLSN(page, recptr);
> +
> + XLogFlush(recptr);
> }
>
>
> If a user uses sequence value for some external systems, the
> rollbacked value may surprise them.
> [I didn't run into this issue in any real case, I just studied xlog /
> sequence stuff today and found this case].
I think that is a bad idea.
It will have an intolerable performance impact on OLTP queries, doubling
the number of I/O requests for many cases.
Perhaps it would make sense to document that you should never rely on
sequence values from an uncommitted transaction.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-11-22 07:23:08 | Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields |
Previous Message | Andy Fan | 2021-11-22 07:13:50 | Re: Keep notnullattrs in RelOptInfo (Was part of UniqueKey patch series) |