Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Chapman Flack <jcflack(at)acm(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?
Date: 2024-06-15 16:48:53
Message-ID: cdb8c248-6563-4143-b3d9-2fb274fa7b4d@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2024-06-15 Sa 10:51, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2024, at 10:39, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>> The changes are straightforward and look good to me. However, I have kept the existing test of an empty array as is, assuming that it is one of the valid tests. It now returns zero rows instead of an error. Your added test case covers this issue.
>> Makes sense, thank you.
> Added https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/5039/.
>

Not really needed, I will commit shortly.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-06-15 17:26:57 Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-06-15 16:48:33 Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework