| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Define jsonpath functions as stable |
| Date: | 2019-09-17 17:58:31 |
| Message-ID: | cd8c8abe-661a-c65d-9ee4-5f32424e527b@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/17/19 12:09 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2019-09-17 17:38, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> [regex.patch]
Thanks for the review!
> "Several other parts of the SQL standard
> also define LIKE_REGEX equivalents that refer
> to this implementation, including the
> SQL/JSON path like_regex filter."
>
> As I understand this text, 'concept' seems better.
> I'd drop 'also', too.
I rewrote this to be:
"Several other parts of the SQL standard refer to the LIKE_REGEX
specification to define similar operations, including..."
> 2.
> 'whereas the POSIX will those' should be
> 'whereas POSIX will regard those'
> or maybe 'read those'
I used "treat those"
>
> 3.
> + The SQL/JSON standard borrows its definition for how regular
> expressions
> + from the <literal>LIKE_REGEX</literal> operator, which in turns
> uses the
> + XQuery standard.
> That sentence needs the verb 'work', no? 'for how regular expressions
> work [..]'
> Or alternatively drop 'how'.
I dropped the "how".
v2 attached. Thanks!
Jonathan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| regex-v2.patch | text/plain | 5.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-09-17 18:01:38 | Re: Psql patch to show access methods info |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-09-17 17:52:21 | Re: another look at macOS SIP |