From: | Vlad <marchenko(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Brandon Metcalf <bmetcalf(at)nortel(dot)com> |
Cc: | dbdpg-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg |
Date: | 2005-04-08 18:12:31 |
Message-ID: | cd70c6810504081112694ba268@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Hi there,
we've noticed that too here and quick explanation is - with the new
"prepare" implementation, the query get prepared on the server side,
which is good; the problem is that all of the bind values passed to
the sql server during execute call are in form of ***varchar***, i.e.
even if a field is of int type in postgresql table, DBD::Pg passes
your bind value as char - as a result, postgresql doesn't use indexes.
I don't know if developers of new DBD::Pg have some game plan to fix
this problem... but it won't be easy: since perl is a no-var-type
language, so either DBD::Pg needs to analyze the table columns data
types first before executing a query and then use correct type for
bind values, or let coder pass those types explicitly... though I'm
not aware of a method in DBI that would let them do that...
Anyone from DBD::Pg can comment this please?
I was going to post an example to the list later today.
On Apr 8, 2005 12:30 PM, Brandon Metcalf <bmetcalf(at)nortel(dot)com> wrote:
> Has anyone done any benchmarking between the old Pg interface and
> DBI/DBD::Pg? I have two versions of some code one of which uses Pg
> and the other DBI/DBD::Pg and the latter appears to cause much more of
> load on the system where it's running than the former. However, I
> haven't done any benchmarking to support this claim.
>
> --
> Brandon
> _______________________________________________
> Dbdpg-general mailing list
> Dbdpg-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/mailman/listinfo/dbdpg-general
>
--
Vlad
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brandon Metcalf | 2005-04-08 18:17:23 | Re: [Dbdpg-general] benchmarking old Pg and DBD::Pg |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-08 14:46:02 | Re: What is the binary format for timestamps? |