Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL

On 23/06/06, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> >
> >> There are several supported platforms not represented on the buildfarm -
> >> e.g. the one HPUX member has never actually reported any results.
> >
> > Yeah, and this is not a good thing. Eventually I'd like to get to a
> > point where every platform we consider "supported" has regular buildfarm
> > reports. No more calls for port reports during beta periods --- beta
> > work should focus on functionality testing, not getting it to build.
> >
>
> Then people who have access to people who own or can provide access to
> machines in classes not covered need to do a bit of begging ;-)
>
> The requirements are (deliberately) very modest:
>
> Once it is set up it is close to hands free - you just set up the cron
> job(s) or equivalent.

Hello,

I'll try to set up a buildfarm installation for Cygwin on my computer at work.
But I'm taking the next week off, so this will have to wait until my return.

Cheers,
Adrian Maier