From: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Inherited an 18TB DB & need to backup |
Date: | 2020-05-16 02:18:27 |
Message-ID: | cd2b1610-5656-7a43-14eb-48386fb50416@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgeu-general pgsql-general |
On 5/15/20 6:01 PM, Michael Nolan wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:51 PM Ravi Krishna <srkrishna1(at)comcast(dot)net
> <mailto:srkrishna1(at)comcast(dot)net>> wrote:
>
>>
>> Why should the backup land in S3, and not local somewhere?
>> Any good reason why one should pay for the additional storage and
>> transfer costs?
>>
> Good question. The key point in my statement was "db of this size".
>
> The problem with local backup is that space is not infinite.
>
>
> Another problem is storage devices fail. S3 storage lakes _should_ be
> checking your data integrity on a regular basis and possibly maintaining
> copies of it iin multiple locations so you're not vulnerable to a site
> disaster.
Tape FTW!!
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rob Sargent | 2020-05-16 12:18:23 | Re: Inherited an 18TB DB & need to backup |
Previous Message | Suhail Bamzena | 2020-05-16 00:20:00 | Re: Inherited an 18TB DB & need to backup |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter J. Holzer | 2020-05-16 10:01:11 | Re: Enforcing uniqueness on [real estate/postal] addresses |
Previous Message | Suhail Bamzena | 2020-05-16 00:20:00 | Re: Inherited an 18TB DB & need to backup |