Re: Optimization for lower(), upper(), casefold() functions.

From: Alexander Borisov <lex(dot)borisov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Optimization for lower(), upper(), casefold() functions.
Date: 2025-03-02 20:33:07
Message-ID: cc097475-8fc5-4d3a-8044-8438126933b2@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

19.02.2025 01:56, Jeff Davis пишет:
> On Wed, 2025-02-19 at 01:54 +0300, Alexander Borisov wrote:
>> In proposing the patch for v3, I struck a balance between improving
>> performance and reducing binary size, without sacrificing code
>> clarity.
>
> Fair enough. I will continue reviewing v3.

Did you have a time for review this?

I'd like to continue improving Unicode in Postgres, as I previously
wrote, next in my plans are Normalization forms, and more.
But now I am blocked by this patch.

--
Alexander Borisov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2025-03-02 21:08:33 Re: 64 bit numbers vs format strings
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2025-03-02 20:29:17 Re: Statistics Import and Export