Re: cursors with prepared statements

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cursors with prepared statements
Date: 2018-06-11 16:26:11
Message-ID: cbed8cb0-7a0c-a50d-5e1e-b2575273b35a@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/11/18 09:57, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Sounds like a reasonable approach. Have you not considered using a
> special OPEN syntax because there are some other forms of problems
> with it?

There is no OPEN command in direct SQL. Do you mean whether I have
considered introducing an OPEN command? Yes, but it seems to me that
that would create weird inconsistencies and doesn't seem very useful in
practice.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2018-06-11 16:30:49 Re: Locking B-tree leafs immediately in exclusive mode
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-06-11 15:55:02 Re: Spilling hashed SetOps and aggregates to disk