Suggestion for the postgresql.org survey

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Suggestion for the postgresql.org survey
Date: 2003-02-26 14:44:08
Message-ID: cadec5e9de7ae78a350954f6f9cededc@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In another thread ("7.4?") <20030226110156(dot)4FD8E4180F(at)mailer(dot)elma(dot)fr>,
someone wrote:

> ... looking the survey of Postgres.org web site :
> http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=9

I would receommend taking the results of these polls with a large grain
of salt. I just reloaded my browser three times and watched the totals
change. Could we add a way to limit the ballot stuffing? I realize that
no method is perfect, but a simple cookie plus an IP restriction (with
timeout) should help immensely and not be too hard to implement.

Thanks,
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200302260934

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+XNGovJuQZxSWSsgRAj0cAJ4quXTKrH2ly1QDQ8WnRhQEGducCACfQw0D
jKJkdilJ07Hvp017ARPLUs0=
=CEfq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mick van der Most van Spijk 2003-02-26 14:50:12 Dynamically create scheme
Previous Message Patrik Kudo 2003-02-26 14:30:05 index usage (and foreign keys/triggers)