Re: SHA-2 functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: SHA-2 functions
Date: 2018-02-22 18:26:48
Message-ID: cadda1b3-f12a-8711-4c71-6ae7d924117e@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/22/18 01:05, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:45:17PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2/20/18 23:04, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> I think that crypto_hash.c or hash_crypt.c would be adapted as well.
>>> crypt.c is too much generic, so including both concepts in the name is
>>> the way to go. The name given by Tom here sounds actually nice.
>>
>> Updated patches
>
> I have been reviewing both patches, and those look good to me.

Committed, thanks

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Kuzmenkov 2018-02-22 18:42:08 Re: [HACKERS] PoC: full merge join on comparison clause
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-02-22 18:24:21 Re: Allow workers to override datallowconn