From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mitar <mmitar(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feature: temporary materialized views |
Date: | 2019-03-10 06:55:08 |
Message-ID: | cabb4131-14fc-6d88-5c64-9d4d0b221b15@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/8/19 3:38 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:45:04AM +0200, David Steele wrote:
>> I think a new patch is required here so I have marked this Waiting on
>> Author. cfbot is certainly not happy and anyone trying to review is going
>> to have hard time trying to determine what to review.
>
> I would recommend to mark this patch as returned with feedback as we
> already know that we need to rethink a bit harder the way relations
> are created in CTAS, not to mention that the case of EXPLAIN CTAS IF
> NOT EXISTS is not correctly handled. This requires more than three of
> work which is what remains until the end of this CF, so v12 is not a
> sane target.
OK, I will do that on March 13th if there are no arguments to the contrary.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2019-03-10 07:15:35 | Re: Patch to document base64 encoding |
Previous Message | David Steele | 2019-03-10 06:42:08 | Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? |