From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog |
Date: | 2017-02-24 02:56:03 |
Message-ID: | ca7b04cd-8850-7d05-94ae-eb36b84eccbb@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/23/17 8:47 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Anything else than measured in bytes either requires a lookup at the
> file timestamp, which is not reliable with noatime or a lookup at WAL
> itself to decide when is the commit timestamp that matches the oldest
> point in time of the backup policy.
An indication that it'd be nice to have a better way to store this
information as part of a base backup, or the archived WAL files.
> That could be made performance
> wise with an archive command. With pg_receivexlog you could make use
> of the end-segment command to scan the completely written segment for
> this data before moving on to the next one. At least it gives an
> argument for having such a command. David Steele mentioned that he
> could make use of such a thing.
BTW, I'm not opposed to an end-segment command; I'm just saying I don't
think having it would really help users very much.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-02-24 02:57:26 | Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-02-24 02:52:16 | Re: Automatic cleanup of oldest WAL segments with pg_receivexlog |