Re: Postgresql Hardware

From: Psicopunk <gil(dot)nunes(dot)resende(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql Hardware
Date: 2009-09-11 17:09:27
Message-ID: ca397743-6e21-4a61-880b-1072ccd69616@w10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11 Set, 17:59, vi(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)khera(dot)org (Vick Khera) wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Psicopunk <gil(dot)nunes(dot)rese(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > What HW is more important to postgresql performance?
> > Assuming that the database will have some load, what hardware must i
> > buy?
>
> Generally, you put as much RAM as you can afford, and then buy the
> fastest disks you can afford.
>
> Any advice beyond that will depend on taking exact measurements of
> your application load and finding the bottlenecks and then increasing
> performance at those points.  Usually it is I/O that limits you, so
> you can also optimize your application by adjusting your schema design
> and your queries.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-gene(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

How can i take some measurements to understand what bottlenecks will
appear?

This application will be always writing to database. How can i measure
the load at the database?
Can i tune the database depending on the hardware that i will buy?

Thanks for your help.
Best regards.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alan McKay 2009-09-11 18:08:49 Re: Postgresql Hardware
Previous Message Bill Moran 2009-09-11 17:06:27 Re: Postgresql Hardware