From: | pgsql at tomd(dot)cc (Tom Dunstan) |
---|---|
To: | |
Subject: | [Pljava-dev] Working on 1.4 beta release |
Date: | 2007-11-20 17:55:15 |
Message-ID: | ca33c0a30711200955x218f26e0m8afd0956e22edcda@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pljava-dev |
On Nov 20, 2007 11:09 AM, Thomas Hallgren <thomas at tada.se> wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure I was able to compile pljava against a 1.5 JDK and run
> > it against a 1.6 one. So I don't think we should need to build it for
> > more than one JVM.
> That's assuming that we don't want to support GCJ. That's equal to
> adding a requirement to install a JVM.
Fair point. I think long term the need to support GCJ will probably go
away, however. OpenJDK/IcedTea will basically replace it. Redhat are
already shipping IcedTea in Fedora 8, and I expect other distros to
follow. I think the days of Linux distros not shipping with a decent
JDK by default are coming to an end. Yay!
That's not to say that someone couldn't compile against GCJ if they
like. But I doubt that it'll be a useful thing to prebuild binaries
for.
> Perhaps an idea would be to provide binary support for the latest, or
> the latest two? I.e. if you want older, build your own?
Sure. If we start getting requests to support older backend releases,
then we can revise the decision.
[Stuff about building binaries]
> Great! Would you like to be added to the project so that you can upload
> files there?
Yes, thanks. Hmm, I wasn't actually registered on pgfoundry. Now
registered as tomd.
Cheers
Tom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Dunstan | 2007-11-20 18:00:53 | [Pljava-dev] Working on 1.4 beta release |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2007-11-20 17:10:59 | [Pljava-dev] commit + bug emails |