| From: | "Tom Dunstan" <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Diego Pires Plentz" <diego(dot)pires(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [hibernate-team] PostgreSQLDialect |
| Date: | 2007-11-12 14:35:40 |
| Message-ID: | ca33c0a30711120635o5be2252as818d5afc3ab84c9d@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Nov 12, 2007 2:13 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > Oh, that's nice. Unfortunately, though. it only seems to support major
> > version number differentiation as an int. Apparently the idea that you
> > might have a version number like 8.3 didn't occur to whoever wrote it,
> > although to be fair it looks like the only implementation that
> > actually uses it is Oracle, where that assumption probably holds.
> > Probably wouldn't be that hard to hack to our purposes though...
>
> 800, 801 ...
Nice try :), but as I read the javadoc for DialectFactory it seems to
suggest that hibernate gets the major number from our JDBC driver,
which dutifully reports it as 8. I doubt that we're suggesting hacking
the JDBC driver to lie just to get around this wrinkle when the
obvious solution is to submit a patch to hibernate that makes it pass
both major and minor numbers through, and the Oracle code could
happily ignore the latter.
Cheers
Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-11-12 14:51:47 | Re: [hibernate-team] PostgreSQLDialect |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-11-12 14:16:40 | Re: Clarification reqeusted for "select * from a huge table" |