| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
| Date: | 2023-01-21 13:26:05 |
| Message-ID: | c9c9fa6d-6de6-48c2-4f8b-0fbeef026439@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-01-20 Fr 13:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> On 2023-01-20 12:09:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The core problem here is that requiring that would translate to
>>> requiring every code contributor to have a working copy of pg_bsd_indent.
>> Wouldn't just every committer suffice?
> Not if we have cfbot complaining about it.
>
> (Another problem here is that there's a sizable subset of committers
> who clearly just don't care, and I'm not sure we can convince them to.)
I think we could do better with some automation tooling for committers
here. One low-risk and simple change would be to provide a
non-destructive mode for pgindent that would show you the changes if any
it would make. That could be worked into a git pre-commit hook that
committers could deploy. I can testify to the usefulness of such hooks -
I have one that while not perfect has saved me on at least two occasions
from forgetting to bump the catalog version.
I'll take a look at fleshing this out, for my own if no-one else's use.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2023-01-21 14:11:43 | Re: Doc: Rework contrib appendix -- informative titles, tweaked sentences |
| Previous Message | Jim Jones | 2023-01-21 12:35:49 | Re: Authentication fails for md5 connections if ~/.postgresql/postgresql.{crt and key} exist |