Re: Comments on Custom RMGRs

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Danil Anisimow <anisimow(dot)d(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comments on Custom RMGRs
Date: 2024-03-21 19:07:38
Message-ID: c978f4127cf30280fdee877c3e6e5cfaa26e11af.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 19:47 +0700, Danil Anisimow wrote:
> The proposed patch is not a complete solution for pgss and may not
> work correctly with replication.

Also, what is the desired behavior during replication? Should queries
on the primary be represented in pgss on the replica? If the answer is
yes, should they be differentiated somehow so that you can know where
the slow queries are running?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2024-03-21 19:10:42 Re: Statistics Import and Export
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2024-03-21 19:02:03 Re: Comments on Custom RMGRs