Re: Quesion about querying distributed databases

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: me nefcanto <sn(dot)1361(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Quesion about querying distributed databases
Date: 2025-03-05 09:55:01
Message-ID: c9699a6fd331d33864fc269060d8d961f784d827.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 12:57 +0330, me nefcanto wrote:
> Right now this data is in MariaDB, on separate databases (schema) but on one
> server. The solution in this situation is to have a cross-database query.
> (this is the status quo of our application)
>
> Now our team has decided to migrate to Postgres. However, we realized that
> Postgres does not support cross-database queries. And if we want to do so,
> we should use FDW. So, we thought we might as well put databases on separate
> servers for scalability if we have to write more code. That's the reason
> behind this question.

In MySQL, the terms "database" and "schema" are used for the same thing.
Not so in PostgreSQL. I think you should migrate the data into different
schemas in a single database, pretty much like you had it in MySQL.
Then you don't need a foreign data wrapper, and I bet the query can
perform as well as it did on MySQL.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message me nefcanto 2025-03-05 10:48:20 Re: Quesion about querying distributed databases
Previous Message Mike Yeap 2025-03-05 09:38:57 Virtual patching software for PostgreSQL