| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "daniel(at)yesql(dot)se" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] test/ssl: rework the sslfiles Makefile target |
| Date: | 2021-09-02 11:09:08 |
| Message-ID: | c96718ea-747f-6ab4-ca55-44273b232891@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/1/21 8:09 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 15:02 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 12:08:16AM +0000, Jacob Champion wrote:
>>> If _that's_ the case, then our build system is holding all of us
>>> hostage. Which is frustrating to me. Should I shift focus to help with
>>> that, first?
>> Fresh ideas in this area are welcome, yes.
> Since the sslfiles target is its own little island in the dependency
> graph (it doesn't need anything from Makefile.global), would it be
> acceptable to just move it to a standalone sslfiles.mk that the
> Makefile defers to? E.g.
>
> sslfiles:
> $(MAKE) -f sslfiles.mk
> Then we wouldn't have to touch Makefile.global at all, because
> sslfiles.mk wouldn't need to include it. This also reduces .NOTPARALLEL
> pollution as a bonus.
>
I had he same thought yesterday, so I like the idea :-)
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-09-02 11:12:41 | Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-09-02 11:07:10 | Re: Fix pkg-config file for static linking |