| From: | Benjamin Schaller <benjamin(dot)schaller(at)s2018(dot)tu-chemnitz(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Raw device on PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2020-04-28 08:43:27 |
| Message-ID: | c8753453-f7e5-5607-585b-8bee2f42b265@s2018.tu-chemnitz.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hey,
for an university project I'm currently doing some research on
PostgreSQL. I was wondering if hypothetically it would be possible to
implement a raw device system to PostgreSQL. I know that the
disadvantages would probably be higher than the advantages compared to
working with the file system. Just hypothetically: Would it be possible
to change the source code of PostgreSQL so a raw device system could be
implemented, or would that cause a chain reaction so that basically one
would have to rewrite almost the entire code, because too many elements
of PostgreSQL rely on the file system?
Best regards
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rajin Raj | 2020-04-28 09:22:07 | PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length) |
| Previous Message | Masahiro Ikeda | 2020-04-28 08:42:32 | Re: Why are wait events not reported even though it reads/writes a timeline history file? |