From: | Adrien NAYRAT <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Kuroda, Hayato" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Log a sample of transactions |
Date: | 2019-03-28 09:33:02 |
Message-ID: | c86d676a-0b1e-f9be-3da2-63fa15070db0@anayrat.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
On 3/28/19 3:18 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry, I changed that, someone suggest using either "0" and "1", or
>>> "0.0" and "1.0" but not mixing both.
>
> Agreed with using "0.0" and "1.0".
>
>>> I will remove this change.
>>>
>
> --- a/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
> +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/postgresql.conf.sample
> +#log_transaction_sample_rate = 0 # Fraction of transactions
> whose statements
> + # are logged regardless of
> their duration. 1.0 logs all
> + # statements from all
> transactions, 0 never logs.
>
> --- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
> +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
> + {"log_transaction_sample_rate", PGC_SUSET, LOGGING_WHEN,
> + gettext_noop("Set the fraction of transactions
> to log for new transactions."),
> + gettext_noop("Logs all statements from a
> fraction of transactions. "
> + "Use a value between
> 0 (never log) and 1 (log all "
> + "statements for all
> transactions).")
>
> I think it would be better to use the same number in both guc.c and
> postgresql.conf.sample. How about unifying them to "0.0" and "1.0" for
> consistency?
>
I changed to use both 0.0 and 1.0.
Thanks!
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
log_xact-7.patch | text/x-patch | 6.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2019-03-28 09:33:23 | Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2019-03-28 09:32:21 | Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill) |