Re: Remove non-fast promotion Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2

On 2020/04/21 17:15, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:26:16 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote in
>> Patch attached. I will add this into the first CF for v14.
>
> - if (!fast_promoted)
> + if (!promoted)
> RequestCheckpoint(CHECKPOINT_END_OF_RECOVERY |
> CHECKPOINT_IMMEDIATE |
> CHECKPOINT_WAIT);
>
> If we don't find the checkpoint record just before, we don't insert
> End-Of-Recovery record then run an immediate chekpoint. I think if we
> nuke the non-fast promotion, shouldn't we insert the EOR record even
> in that case?

I'm not sure if that's safe. What if the server crashes before the checkpoint
completes in that case? Since the last checkpoint record is not available,
the subsequent crash recovery will fail. This would lead to that the server
will never start up. Right? Currently ISTM that end-of-recovery-checkpoint
is executed to avoid such trouble in that case.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION