Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment

From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date: 2020-06-05 12:05:34
Message-ID: c741e0c1-507c-9ac9-aa1f-53ce00e43188@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2/6/20 10:45 μ.μ., Ravi Krishna wrote:
>> Generally speaking, I discourage having lots of databases under one PG
>> cluster for exactly these kinds of reasons. PG's individual clusters
>> are relatively lightweight, after all.
>>
> Plus PG does not directly support cross database queries using 3 part name, something
> sqlserver excels at.
Maybe because SQL server does not have real databases but schemas instead ?
This sucks security wise.
>
>
>
>

--
Achilleas Mantzios
IT DEV Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ravi Krishna 2020-06-05 12:33:59 Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Previous Message Imre Samu 2020-06-05 11:48:19 Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH?