| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jack Orenstein <jao(at)geophile(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Very large table: Partition it or not? |
| Date: | 2020-12-17 03:34:35 |
| Message-ID: | c6aff1a1d73977f62f5d5b77cd60804c8b7d2b28.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 14:44 -0500, Jack Orenstein wrote:
> What are the pros and cons of partitioning the table?
Pro:
- it bebomes easier to get rid of old data
- autovacuum is more fun with several smaller tables
- a few select queries might become faster
Con:
- administrative overhead (creating and dropping partitions)
- most queries become slightly slower
> Without partitioning, are we liable to run into trouble as this table keeps growing?
That is hard to answer. If it works fine with 5*10^9 rows, it might also
work fine with more data.
The deciding factor might be getting rid of old data. That can be quite
painful with a single large table, but it might be trivial with partitioning.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gustavsson Mikael | 2020-12-17 07:21:08 | Problem with ssl and psql in Postgresql 13 |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-12-17 01:46:16 | Re: Autovacuum not functioning for large tables but it is working for few other small tables. |