Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Sandro Santilli <strk(at)kbt(dot)io>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date: 2023-04-21 21:25:26
Message-ID: c69094c540a60ebe1946ed21eb6aa38320187804.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 22:08 +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> > > > >
> Is that the right fix, though? (It forces --locale-provider=libc for
> the
> cluster default, which might not be desirable?)

For the "no locale" behavior (memcmp()-based) the provider needs to be
libc. Do you see an alternative?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2023-04-21 21:35:09 Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2023-04-21 21:19:36 Re: base backup vs. concurrent truncation