Re: [PATCH] Log details for client certificate failures

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Log details for client certificate failures
Date: 2022-06-30 09:43:21
Message-ID: c60a8948-00a0-147d-75df-62699193371f@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 13.05.22 00:36, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 15:12 +0000, Jacob Champion wrote:
>> On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 15:53 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> In terms of aligning what is printed, I meant that pg_stat_ssl uses the
>>> issuer plus serial number to identify the certificate unambiguously.
>>
>> Oh, that's a great idea. I'll do that too.
>
> v2 limits the maximum subject length and adds the serial number to the
> logs.

I wrote that pg_stat_ssl uses the *issuer* plus serial number to
identify a certificate. What your patch shows is the subject and the
serial number, which isn't the same thing. Let's get that sorted out
one way or the other.

Another point, your patch produces

LOG: connection received: host=localhost port=44120
LOG: client certificate verification failed at depth 1: ...
DETAIL: failed certificate had subject ...
LOG: could not accept SSL connection: certificate verify failed

I guess what we really would like is

LOG: connection received: host=localhost port=44120
LOG: could not accept SSL connection: certificate verify failed
DETAIL: client certificate verification failed at depth 1: ...
failed certificate had subject ...

But I suppose that would be very cumbersome to produce with the callback
structure provided by OpenSSL?

I'm not saying the proposed way is unacceptable, but maybe it's worth
being explicit about this tradeoff.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Graham Leggett 2022-06-30 09:53:58 Re: [PATCH] Log details for client certificate failures
Previous Message Hamid Akhtar 2022-06-30 09:40:07 Re: Allow pageinspect's bt_page_stats function to return a set of rows instead of a single row