From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
Date: | 2024-05-19 14:42:01 |
Message-ID: | c5a0e106-b1cc-4e36-b6bd-0866db548c68@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/19/24 05:37, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> * How to deal with review scalability bottleneck.
>
> An evergreen question. PostgreSQL is getting more popular and, as stated in
> diverse research whitepapers, the amount of contribution grows as a power
> law, where the number of reviewers grows at best sub-linearly (limited by the
> velocity of knowledge sharing). I agree with Andrey on this, the only
> way I see to handle this is to scale CF management efforts.
The number of items tracked are surely growing, but I am not sure I
would call it exponential -- see attached
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
![]() |
image/png | 39.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Wienhold | 2024-05-19 14:43:39 | Re: Underscore in positional parameters? |
Previous Message | André Verwijs | 2024-05-19 12:03:42 | postgresql 17 (testing) SLES 15.5 missing "repodata" .. |