Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
Date: 2024-05-19 14:42:01
Message-ID: c5a0e106-b1cc-4e36-b6bd-0866db548c68@joeconway.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/19/24 05:37, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> * How to deal with review scalability bottleneck.
>
> An evergreen question. PostgreSQL is getting more popular and, as stated in
> diverse research whitepapers, the amount of contribution grows as a power
> law, where the number of reviewers grows at best sub-linearly (limited by the
> velocity of knowledge sharing). I agree with Andrey on this, the only
> way I see to handle this is to scale CF management efforts.

The number of items tracked are surely growing, but I am not sure I
would call it exponential -- see attached

--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
image/png 39.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Wienhold 2024-05-19 14:43:39 Re: Underscore in positional parameters?
Previous Message André Verwijs 2024-05-19 12:03:42 postgresql 17 (testing) SLES 15.5 missing "repodata" ..