Re: Showing parallel status in \df+

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date: 2016-09-30 23:21:15
Message-ID: c5953b36-a81a-156f-f211-4a54dc8a348d@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/28/16 2:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I am sorry, I disagree. Proposed form is hard readable. Is not possible to
>> > simply copy/paste.
> Why do you care? You can use \sf if you want to copy&paste the
> function code.
>
>> > I cannot to imagine any use case for proposed format.
> My vote (which was not counted by Stephen) was to remove it from \df+
> altogether. I stand by that. People who are used to seeing the output
> in \df+ will wonder "where the heck did it go" and eventually figure it
> out, at which point it's no longer a problem. We're not breaking
> anyone's scripts, that's for sure.
>
> If we're not removing it, I +0 support the option of moving it to
> footers. I'm -1 on doing nothing.

I agree with everything Alvaro just said.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-09-30 23:37:53 Show hash / bitmap sizes in EXPLAIN ANALYZE?
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-09-30 23:08:27 Re: sloppy handling of pointers