Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date: 2022-02-09 15:55:38
Message-ID: c5404c65-2638-34e0-4a61-cd27505ef64a@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 6/16/21 03:52, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:01 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> Rather than use size, I'd be inclined to say use this if the source
>> database is marked as a template, and use the copydir approach for
>> anything that isn't.
> Yeah, that is possible, on the other thought wouldn't it be good to
> provide control to the user by providing two different commands, e.g.
> COPY DATABASE for the existing method (copydir) and CREATE DATABASE
> for the new method (fully wal logged)?
>

This proposal seems to have gotten lost.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2022-02-09 15:56:23 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-02-09 15:45:02 Re: [PATCH] Improve function toast_delete_external (src/backend/access/table/toast_helper.c)