Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root?
Date: 2020-09-06 14:59:11
Message-ID: c53e70b0-d273-2efc-5f26-1c905ee90771@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-08-25 21:48, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 08:47:53AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>
>> Hello Peter,
>>
>>> The original stylesheets explicitly go out of their way to do it that
>>> way. We can easily fix that by removing that special case. See attached
>>> patch.
>>>
>>> That patch only fixes it for the header. To fix it for the footer as
>>> well, we'd first need to import the navfooter template to be able to
>>> customize it.
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, which applies cleanly, doc compiles, works for me with
>> w3m.
>>
>>> Not a big problem though.
>>
>> Nope, just mildly irritating for quite a long time:-) So I'd go for back
>> patching if it applies cleanly.
>
> Can we get Peter's patch for this applied soon? Thanks. Should I apply
> it?

I have made the analogous changes to the footer as well and committed this.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-09-06 15:06:59 Re: Dubious code in pg_rewind's process_target_file()
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-09-06 14:54:22 Re: Dubious code in pg_rewind's process_target_file()