From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, buildfarm(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop? |
Date: | 2024-05-12 16:20:48 |
Message-ID: | c481b50b-568b-4d65-9e30-103a8c490a76@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-05-12 Su 08:26, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-05-12 Su 01:34, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, I've also been wondering why hamerkop has been failing
>> isolation-check in the 12 and 13 branches for the last six months
>> or so. It is surely unrelated to this issue, and it looks like
>> it must be due to some platform change rather than anything we
>> committed at the time.
>
>
> Possibly. It looks like this might be the issue:
>
> +Connection 2 failed: could not initiate GSSAPI security context: Unspecified GSS failure. Minor code may provide more information: Credential cache is empty
> +FATAL: sorry, too many clients already
>
>
> There are several questions here, including:
>
> 1. why isn't it failing on later branches?
> 2. why isn't it failing on drongo (which has more modern compiler and OS)?
>
> I think we'll need the help of the animal owner to dig into the issue.
Aha! drongo doesn't have GSSAPI enabled. Will work on that.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2024-05-12 17:16:58 | Hot standby queries see transient all-zeros pages |
Previous Message | Paul Jungwirth | 2024-05-12 15:51:11 | Re: SQL:2011 application time |