Re: Backward compat issue with v16 around ROLEs

From: Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>
To: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Backward compat issue with v16 around ROLEs
Date: 2024-09-11 19:17:24
Message-ID: c42d9931-1ec3-4f41-8b4c-a30f5f79e77d@technowledgy.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dominique Devienne:
> Hi David. I did as you suggested, and it fails the same way. Did I
> misunderstand you? --DD
>
> [..]
>
> ddevienne=> grant dd_owner to dd_admin with admin option; -- <<<<<<<<

I think this needs to be the other way around:

grant dd_admin to dd_owner with admin option;

Best,

Wolfgang

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2024-09-11 19:21:56 Re: Backward compat issue with v16 around ROLEs
Previous Message Dominique Devienne 2024-09-11 15:28:04 Re: Backward compat issue with v16 around ROLEs