Re: Fix of fake unlogged LSN initialization

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix of fake unlogged LSN initialization
Date: 2019-10-25 06:54:53
Message-ID: c385b0fc-9f7f-b1d0-c50f-d11506f79a03@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24/10/2019 15:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:57:33AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I wonder why is that value 1000, rather than an aligned value or a whole
>> WAL page?
>
> Good question. Heikki, why this choice?

No particular reason, it's just a nice round value in decimal.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-10-25 06:55:32 Re: Fix of fake unlogged LSN initialization
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-10-25 06:43:18 Duplicate entries in pg_depend after REINDEX CONCURRENTLY