Re: A problem presentaion about ECPG, DECLARE STATEMENT

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A problem presentaion about ECPG, DECLARE STATEMENT
Date: 2019-09-11 16:04:03
Message-ID: c382af4b414252c43c4807444635723fca782fa6.camel@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > Is it acceptable for PG12?
> > In general absolutely.
>
> It seems far too late to be considering any major rewrite for v12;
> even assuming that there was consensus on the rewrite being an
> improvement, which I bet there won't be.

Oops, I read 13. Yes, it's obviously way too late for 12. Sorry for the
noise.

In this case I'd like to details about what is wrong with the
implementation.

Thanks.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-09-11 16:30:22 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-09-11 15:46:43 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks