From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
Date: | 2024-02-28 21:50:23 |
Message-ID: | c358c735-2f84-3b2a-6e65-4fb76834c116@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-02-28 We 09:05, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
> Daniel and I discussed trying a Python version of the test server,
> since the standard library there should give us more goodies to work
> with. A proof of concept is in 0009. I think the big question I have
> for it is, how would we communicate what we want the server to do for
> the test? (We could perhaps switch on magic values of the client ID?)
> In the end I'd like to be testing close to 100% of the failure modes,
> and that's likely to mean a lot of back-and-forth if the server
> implementation isn't in the Perl process.
Can you give some more details about what this python gadget would buy
us? I note that there are a couple of CPAN modules that provide OAuth2
servers, not sure if they would be of any use.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-02-28 21:52:40 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
Previous Message | Andrew Atkinson | 2024-02-28 21:43:27 | Re: An improved README experience for PostgreSQL |