From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | er(at)xs4all(dot)nl, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GROUP BY DISTINCT |
Date: | 2021-02-21 14:14:12 |
Message-ID: | c350ff6b-d70d-9952-be23-a18855b62589@postgresfriends.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 2/21/21 3:06 PM, er(at)xs4all(dot)nl wrote:
>> On 2021.02.21. 13:52 Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> Attached is a patch to implement this for PostgreSQL.
>> []
>
> The changed line that gets stuffed into sql_features is missing a terminal value (to fill the 'comments' column).
> This line:
> '+T434 GROUP BY DISTINCT YES'
>
> (A tab at the end will do, I suppose; that's how I fixed the patch locally)
Argh. Fixed.
Thank you for looking at it!
--
Vik Fearing
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-implement-GROUP-BY-DISTINCT.v02.patch | text/x-patch | 19.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2021-02-22 00:21:41 | Re: Inaccuracy in wal_receiver_status_interval parameter description |
Previous Message | er | 2021-02-21 14:06:03 | Re: GROUP BY DISTINCT |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-02-21 15:43:59 | Re: Fallback table AM for relkinds without storage |
Previous Message | er | 2021-02-21 14:06:03 | Re: GROUP BY DISTINCT |