Re: GROUP BY DISTINCT

From: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
To: er(at)xs4all(dot)nl, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GROUP BY DISTINCT
Date: 2021-02-21 14:14:12
Message-ID: c350ff6b-d70d-9952-be23-a18855b62589@postgresfriends.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On 2/21/21 3:06 PM, er(at)xs4all(dot)nl wrote:
>> On 2021.02.21. 13:52 Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> Attached is a patch to implement this for PostgreSQL.
>> []
>
> The changed line that gets stuffed into sql_features is missing a terminal value (to fill the 'comments' column).
> This line:
> '+T434 GROUP BY DISTINCT YES'
>
> (A tab at the end will do, I suppose; that's how I fixed the patch locally)

Argh. Fixed.

Thank you for looking at it!
--
Vik Fearing

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-implement-GROUP-BY-DISTINCT.v02.patch text/x-patch 19.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira 2021-02-22 00:21:41 Re: Inaccuracy in wal_receiver_status_interval parameter description
Previous Message er 2021-02-21 14:06:03 Re: GROUP BY DISTINCT

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-02-21 15:43:59 Re: Fallback table AM for relkinds without storage
Previous Message er 2021-02-21 14:06:03 Re: GROUP BY DISTINCT