| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | text coverage for EXTRACT() |
| Date: | 2020-06-09 11:36:58 |
| Message-ID: | c3306ac7-fcae-a1b8-1e30-6a379d605bcb@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
During the discussion in [0] I noticed that the extract()/date_part()
variants for time, timetz, and interval had virtually no test coverage.
So I put some more tests together, which should be useful if we decide
to make any changes in this area per [0].
[0]:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9%40phystech.edu
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Add-test-coverage-for-EXTRACT.patch | text/plain | 13.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Khandekar | 2020-06-09 11:50:25 | Auto-vectorization speeds up multiplication of large-precision numerics |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2020-06-09 11:34:51 | Re: Include access method in listTables output |