Re: month abreviation

From: "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Euler Taveira de Oliveira" <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: month abreviation
Date: 2007-06-22 06:37:07
Message-ID: c2d9e70e0706212337y6b137aaaid728ec2165daed9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/22/07, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>
> > note the month abreviation (mons?) is this intentional?
> >
> This notation has been used since the code was written (~7 years ago) [1].
>
> [1]
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/datetime.c?rev=1.42;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup
>

mmm... so, it had been bad for 7 years now... ;)
ok, acceptting that as an abreviattion for months, what controls that.
why u get "years", "days" and "mons", i mean, why is this one
abreviated when the other two are not

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
Richard Cook

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2007-06-22 08:02:35 Re: What does Page Layout version mean? (Was: Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3)
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2007-06-22 05:31:46 pgstat_drop_relation bugfix