From: | "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax |
Date: | 2006-05-17 00:51:10 |
Message-ID: | c2d9e70e0605161751t70bb3ccbxfc8362f217695e3b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/16/06, David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On May 16, 2006, at 16:30, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> > It ought to be illegal to modify the loop control variable anyway,
> > IMNSHO - it certainly is in Ada, the distant antecedent of pl/pgsql.
>
> I agree, but I must say that it's incredibly useful to be able to
> increment by two as I go through a loop:
>
> FOR i IN 1 + offset .. 11 + offset LOOP
> total := total + substring(ean, i, 1)::INTEGER;
> i = i + 1;
> END LOOP;
>
> Best,
>
> David
>
i have posted a patch to add a BY clause to the for statement (integer
version), with the BY clause you can specify an increment value...
it's in the unapplied patches list waiting for review...
http://candle.pha.pa.us/mhonarc/patches/msg00003.html
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the universe trying
to produce bigger and better idiots.
So far, the universe is winning."
Richard Cook
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Wheeler | 2006-05-17 02:07:12 | Re: PL/pgSQL 'i = i + 1' Syntax |
Previous Message | Andrew Piskorski | 2006-05-17 00:14:34 | Re: Compression and on-disk sorting |