| From: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alessandro Baretta <a(dot)baretta(at)barettadeit(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 500x speed-down: Wrong query plan? |
| Date: | 2006-01-09 15:30:21 |
| Message-ID: | c2d9e70e0601090730l7c6ec2f6gd0af6612a4332c4c@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 1/9/06, Alessandro Baretta <a(dot)baretta(at)barettadeit(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello gentlemen,
>
> Although this is my first post on the list, I am a fairly experienced PostgreSQL
> programmer. I am writing an ERP application suite using PostgreSQL as the
> preferred DBMS. Let me state that the SQL DDL is automatically generated by a
> CASE tool from an ER model. The generated schema contains the appropriate
> primary key and foreign key constraints, as defined by the original ER model, as
> well as "reverse indexes" on foreign keys, allowing (in theory) rapid backward
> navigation of foreign keys in joins.
>
> Let me show a sample join of two tables in the database schema. The information
> provided is quite extensive. I'm sorry for that, but I think it is better to
> provide the list with all the relevant information.
>
> Package: postgresql-7.4
maybe, because you are in developing state, you can start to think in
upgrading to 8.1
--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Harry Jackson | 2006-01-09 15:40:31 | Re: help tuning queries on large database |
| Previous Message | Matteo Beccati | 2006-01-09 15:02:18 | Re: 500x speed-down: Wrong query plan? |