Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

From: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options
Date: 2005-12-16 19:29:05
Message-ID: c2d9e70e0512161129o3676d34cn7e0b7b1016eb49db@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> Also, I don't actually see any point to this in psql, as you can
> always do
> begin;
> \i file
> end;
> It's only pg_restore that you really need it for. Dropping the psql
> part of the patch might give us a little more maneuvering room as far
> as the switch name goes.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

maybe it could be handy if you do this to migrate from one version to another...
pg_dumpall base | psql

--
regards,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-12-16 19:41:26 Win32 gettimeofday() comment patch
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-12-16 19:04:58 Re: Single-Transaction Utility options