Re: Cost problem

From: Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Victor <victor(at)ambra(dot)ro>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cost problem
Date: 2005-08-03 14:47:26
Message-ID: c2d9e70e05080307473a6f6c0f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 8/2/05, Victor <victor(at)ambra(dot)ro> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I use psql (PostgreSQL) 7.4.5.
>
> I have a cost problem.
>
> A simple select lasts too long.
> I have a table with aprox 900 rows.
> All rows are deleted and reinserted once a minute.
>
> EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM logati;
> QUERY PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Seq Scan on logati (cost=0.00..100741.22 rows=1198722 width=340)
>
>
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM logati;
> QUERY PLAN
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Seq Scan on logati (cost=0.00..100741.22 rows=1198722 width=340)
> (actual time=35927.945..35944.272 rows=842 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 35945.840 ms
> (2 rows)
>
>
> Tha problem is that "EXPLAIN" function raports that the table has
> 1198722 rows.
> But the table has only 836 rows and the select lasts a lot.
>
> If I recreate the table the number of rows is ok and the select is quick
> for some time, but it becomes slower in time.
>
> How can I fix this?
>
> PS: The table has a index but no primary key.
>
> Thank you
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

execute ANALYZE in the table from time to time... And maybe and
better vacuum...

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
(DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roman Neuhauser 2005-08-03 15:08:55 Re: Cursor Issue??
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2005-08-03 14:17:53 Re: Hello