From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Index bloat and the need to REINDEX |
Date: | 2006-08-15 22:44:51 |
Message-ID: | c2a37a715194bccec637104fc8d8da9e@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Is there a better solution to the "index bloat" problem with regards
to minimizing locking while reducing an ever-growing use of disk
space? In particular, it would be nice if there was a way to force
VACUUM [FULL] to do some of the compression that REINDEX now does.
Right now, we have tables that are updated very frequently, and a
vacuum full just doesn't do much to reduce the disk space, as
the indexes keep growing until a REINDEX is done. Tried on HEAD
as well.
Thanks,
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)endpoint(dot)com greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200608151719
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFE4k3PvJuQZxSWSsgRAjmHAKCDvKmDe3P7HfCmSwOTtnxpimn2EgCghhSF
bSllNWoYjSU+g3yz23N8jXI=
=0Uxr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-15 23:15:26 | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-15 22:42:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived |