Re: make check-world output

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make check-world output
Date: 2017-03-11 03:06:20
Message-ID: c28ac440-d384-6102-571c-6eeadc0c98a5@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/10/17 19:26, Jeff Janes wrote:
> and there will be an exit code.
>
>
> True. But I generally don't rely on that, unless the docs explicitly
> tell me to.
>
>
> If we show no output, then other people will complain that they can't
> tell whether it's hanging.
>
>
> Isn't that what stdout is for?

I haven't ever looked at the difference between stdout and stderr output
from the build process. I rely on the exit code to tell me what
happened. I don't mind changing things if it helps.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mengxing Liu 2017-03-11 03:12:05 [GSOC 17] Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-03-11 02:19:25 Re: make check-world output